Episode 48 — Evaluate service providers with due diligence that matches risk and criticality
This episode teaches third-party due diligence as a risk-matching exercise, because the exam often tests whether you can scale scrutiny based on the provider’s access, data sensitivity, and operational criticality. You’ll define service provider evaluation as assessing security posture, reliability, and governance before onboarding, then connect it to practical questions like what evidence is reasonable to request and what red flags should block adoption. We’ll cover due diligence inputs such as security questionnaires, independent assessments, incident history, data handling practices, access models, and continuity capabilities, with emphasis on verifying claims instead of relying on marketing statements. Real-world scenarios include selecting a SaaS platform that stores customer data, a managed service provider with admin access, and a niche vendor supporting a mission-critical workflow. Troubleshooting includes vendors that resist transparency, mismatched control language, incomplete scope definitions, and how to document risk decisions, compensating controls, and approval outcomes so onboarding is defensible and aligned to the organization’s risk tolerance. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
