Episode 44 — Prove recoverability with restore tests, integrity checks, and documented results
This episode focuses on proving recoverability, because the exam frequently distinguishes “we have backups” from “we can restore correctly under pressure.” You’ll define recoverability as the ability to restore required systems and data within stated objectives, with verified integrity and usable outcomes, not merely completed backup jobs. We’ll cover restore testing types, from file-level restores to full system recovery and application-consistent restores, and how to choose tests that match criticality and change frequency. Integrity checks are emphasized, including checksum validation, verification that restored data is current enough for business use, and ensuring configuration and secrets needed to run the service are recoverable too. Real-world scenarios include restoring after ransomware, validating that backups were not silently corrupted, and recovering cloud workloads where infrastructure definitions and permissions are as important as data. Troubleshooting includes tests that never exercise production-like complexity, missing documentation, unclear success criteria, and how to capture results as audit evidence with dates, scope, steps, outcomes, and remediation actions for failures. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
